Zhixuan Youfa
An AIGC-assisted system for evaluating cross-border product assets and supporting publishing decisions
- Period
- 2025 — 2026
- Status
- Ongoing
- Type
- Product practice
- My role
- Project planning · Product structure · Research coordination · Workflow design · Business materials · Presentation coordination
Overview
A pre-publishing workflow for cross-border sellers that reviews product titles, images, detail pages and ad copy, identifies risks, suggests improvements and supports release decisions.
Background
Before cross-border product assets go live, teams need to review content quality, platform rules and target-market fit at once. This project turns those dispersed checks into a reviewable product workflow. The system is still being refined.
Core questions
- 01How can titles, primary images, detail pages and ad copy share one review flow?
- 02How should quality issues, policy risks and market-fit concerns be separated?
- 03How can automated suggestions preserve human review and an audit trail?
- 04How can test results lead to a clear publishing recommendation?
My responsibilities
- Defined the product goal, target users and core workflow.
- Mapped intake, detection, recommendation, review and reporting steps.
- Connected research inputs with the functional structure.
- Kept business, competition and presentation materials consistent with the product scope.
Process
Research
Mapped recurring tasks in cross-border content production, platform review and market adaptation.
Design
Planned modules for asset intake, quality scoring, rule checks, risk prompts and publishing guidance.
Delivery
Developed a consistent structure for the workflow, interface and report output.
Review
Kept human review and audit records in the flow; the evaluation logic still needs broader real-sample testing.
Output
Produced the system concept, functional workflow, report structure and presentation materials.
Outcomes
- Product structure and functional flow
- Asset-review and publishing framework
- Detection report structure
- Project presentation materials
Evidence & materials
The system is being refined. No verifiable public system or separate GitHub URL was found in this repository, so no external link is shown.
Limitations & reflection
The system should support publishing teams by organizing checks, evidence and review actions—not replace them. The next priority is validating the scoring logic and rule-update process.